Riabilitazione protesica con impianti short GTB: comportamento dell’osso crestale dopo il carico. Case report con follow up a 9 anni

Dr Nicola Vanuzzo

Bibliografia

1. Hermann JS Schoolfield JD,Schenk RK,Buser D,Cochran DL Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants.A istometric evalutation of unloded non summerged implant in the canine mandible.J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-1383

2. Degidi M., Nardi D., Daprile G., Piattelli A.. Nonre- moval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(6):794–805.

3. Ericsson I,Persson LG,Berglundh T,Marinello CP,Lindhe J,Klinge B.Different Types of inflammatory reaction in periimplat soft tissues.J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:255-261

4. Myschin HL,Wiens JP. Facrors affecting soft tissue around dental implants: a revew of the litterature.J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:440-444

5. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Peri- implant inflammation defined by the implant- abut- ment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-478.

6. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72: 1372-1383.

7. D.E. Smith., G.A. Zarb (1989) Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseus implant J Prostet.Dent. 1989,62,567-72.

8. Albrektsson T., Isidor F., Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T., eds. Proceeding of the 1st Europesn Workshop of Periodontology London Quintessence Publishing; 1994:365 369.

9. Tarnow DP, Magner AW,Fetcher P, Te effect of the distant from the contact point of the crest of bone on the presence of the absence of the interproximal dental papilla.J Periodontol 2001;63:995-996

10. Cochran.DL,Hermann JS,Schemk RK,Higginbottom FL& Buser D (1997) Biologic width around titanium implants.a istometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsummerged implant in the canine mandible J Perodontol 1997,68:186-98

11. Becker W,Goldstein M,Beker BE Sennerby L Minimal invasive flapless implant surgery: A prospettive multicenter study Clin Oral Implant Res 2005(Suppl 1):S21-S27

12. Kym Y,Oh TJ,Mish CE,Wang HL. Occlusal consideration in implant terapy:Clinical gudelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implant Res2005;16:26-35

13. Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:9-17.

14. Rodrıguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala` -Torres M, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform- switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:141-151.

15. A short-term clinical study of marginal bone level change around microthreaded and platform-switched implantsJ Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 October; 41(5): 211–217

16. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: Is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18: 581-584.

17. Satoh, T., Maeda, Y. & Komiyama, Y. (2005) Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 20: 533–539.

18. Canay S, Akcxa K. Biomechanical aspects of bone- level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18:239-248.

19. Luigi Canullo , Francesco Pace , Paulo Coelho , Enrico Sciubba , Iole Vozza Influence of platform switching on the biomechanical aspects of the implant-abutment system. A three dimensional finite element studyMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Sep 1;16 (6):e852-6.

20. Hermann JS,Cochran DL Nummikosky PV&Buser D.crestal bon changes around titanium implants.A radiografic evalutation of unloaded,nonsummerged and summerged implant in the canine. 1997.J.Peiodonto 68:1117-30

21. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130.

22. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter- implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71:546-549

23. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347-355.

24. Canullo L, Pellegrini G, Allievi C, Trombelli L, Annibali S, Dellavia CSoft tissues around long-term platform switching implant restorations: a histological human evaluation. Preliminary results. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):86-94.

25. 31..Callan DP, Cobb CM, Williams KB.DNA probe identification of bacteria colonizing internal surfaces of the implant-abutment interface: a preliminary study.J Periodontol. 2005 Jan;76(1):115-20.

26. Canullo L, Quaranta A, Teles RP. The microbiota associated with implants restored with platform switching: a preliminary report J Periodontol. 2010 Mar;81(3):403-11.

27. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;17(10):735-40.

28. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants.nt J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Aug;28(4):347-55

29. Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, Rodado-Alonso C, Méndez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M Int J Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 Oct;29(5):479-87.

30. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. .Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Apr; 25(2):113-9.

31. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1350-66.

32. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An ex- perimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24: 568-572.

33. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:827-832.

34. Jansa ̊ker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Peri- odontol 2006;33:290-295.

35. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34-37

36. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new con- cept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.

37. Vela-Nebot X, Rodr ́ıguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala`-Torres M – Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15:313-320

38. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347-355.

39. Degidi M., Daprile G., Piattelli A.. Marginal bone loss around implants with platform-switched Morse- cone connection: a radiographic cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1108–12.