Implant rehabilitation with GTB SINUS LIFT and TZERO implant

In a previous case report I posed this question:"A geometric form in the service of biology or biology exploiting a geometric form?

"Personally, I will remain with the doubt by continuing to use this geometry in cases where the bone atrophy in the upper maxilla will allow me to obtain a sufficient height for implant insertion and stabilisation, without resorting to regenerative techniques in the maxillary sinus. With the ADVAN GTB SINUS LIFT implant, a new case was treated to continue using this implant geometry, which has already provided satisfactory results.T

he aim is to valorise the osteogenic properties that are activated following the disconnection of Schneider's membrane, exploiting its natural bone support bed. In this case, three ADVAN implants were placed in a patient with different bone volumes (site-specific), in the second quadrant (left upper arch). This case report highlights the role of implant geometry in the management of bone atrophy, offering a less invasive alternative to traditional maxillary sinus elevations.

Introducation

Implantology is the best choice both clinically and biologically for fixed prosthetic rehabilitation. This opportunity becomes even more compelling if there are no natural pillars.The macrogeometry of Advan's GTB SINUS LIFT implant is designed to ensure primary stability even in conditions of atrophy and, or low bone density, which often characterise the posterior regions of the maxilla.ADVAN implants stand out as an optimal solution, providing a wide range of choice and effective insertion in different bone types, both in density and height, even in cases where atrophy of the upper maxilla might otherwise necessitate more invasive surgical procedures.